Limits.

Source: East Nashville News

Source: East Nashville News

Because I usually write positively about graffiti that might give the impression that I’m fine with vandalism and lawbreaking. I’m not. Just because I think there’s graffiti that’s very artistic, well-done, aesthetically pleasing, whatever you want to call it doesn’t mean I’m all for letting anyone tag anything anywhere. It’s just that it’s complicated. Sometimes I look at graffiti and see a person with an intense need to express themselves but no other place to express themselves. And a lot of the places where I see the most artistically interesting graffiti are abandoned, or at least unused, buildings, places with blank walls. Adding a little color and some vibrant language makes these places better. It makes them a little nicer to look at. The same is true of dumpsters which are ugly, utilitarian things. A little graffiti can make them interesting and unique. It can make them into works of art.

At least that’s what I think and I know that sort of thinking puts me on a really slippery slope, but I think there’s got to be a balance between totalitarianism where expression is subject to approval from some overarching authority and chaos where everybody can do whatever they want and there’d be a lot of wanton destruction.

Two recent stories made me think about the need for limits.

First there’s the story of Casey Nocket, a graffiti artist who used acrylic paint, which is really hard to remove, on natural monuments in US national parks. I’ve done volunteer work in parks, including cleaning up trash left behind by thoughtless people. These are places people go to when they when they want to escape the urban world. And nature’s changing these areas enough as it is. These are spaces that have been set aside to be preserved.

I consider this “bad” graffiti no matter how aesthetically interesting it might have been. How do I make that distinction? It’s complicated.

The other event was even closer to home. A dancing bear mural painted on an East Nashville building by artist Leah Tumerman was splattered with white paint. This isn’t even a case of graffiti, really. The building’s owner asked Tumerman to paint the mural. And the white paint was presumably some unknown person’s way of showing displeasure with it. Or maybe they just wanted to put their own mark on it. Some people love the mural and some people hate it but that shouldn’t be a reason to deface it.

Tumerman, with the help of some volunteers, is now fixing the mural and incorporating the vandalism into the mural. And her sister has a strongly-worded rant about the situation that I think is brilliant. It is a nice Art 101 lesson that cuts through my own woolly thinking.

So what’s the distinction between graffiti, street art, and vandalism? It’s complicated. I don’t want to say that anything good comes out of vandalizing natural monuments or a public mural because I don’t want it to sound like I approve because I think they’re terrible things. But it does make me stop and think about why I consider them terrible things. It makes me stop and think about why there should be limits, and maybe that is something good. And maybe I could get your help with my woolly thinking too. Feel free to splatter your own opinions in the comments section. Maybe I’m overcomplicating all this.

And seen any good or bad graffiti? Can’t decide which it is? Send your pictures to freethinkers@nerosoft.com. Maybe I’ll still be just as confused.

4 Comments

  1. Ann

    Your posts make me stop and think, Chris, and there are no limits to my gratitude about that.

    Reply
    1. Christopher Waldrop (Post author)

      And there’s no limit to my gratitude to you for just visiting and taking the time to comment.

      Reply
  2. christina

    I agree with you about parks, etc. It is complicated and all about context. That being said, Banksy is hands down, one of my all time favorite artists. Another interesting medium for graffiti are train cars. My partner is a train conductor and we both enjoy a good mural via those hideous cars. We found one that is personally near and dear to my heart while traveling through the heartland. We turned around to capture this because I am sure it is one of my life and style icons represented on it: Bea Arthur smoking a joint. I will email it to your address. Thanks for the post!

    Reply
    1. Christopher Waldrop (Post author)

      Thank you so much for bringing up so many great things: train cars, Banksy, and Bea Arthur. Really you’re so lucky your partner is a train conductor and gets to see such interesting train cars. Some have some amazing murals on them–they’ve been turned into bona fide works of art. I’ve only been able to get one other work on a train, also a reader submission, and it was amazing.
      I can’t wait to see the one of Bea Arthur smoking a joint. That sounds brilliant in so many ways.

      Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: